Scandal-ridden Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner has been accused of rape. Democrats are finally turning on him. They should have done so a long time ago.
Exactly. If they thought he would win, they would have paid this woman to keep silent. Instead they paid her to go to Politico in time for a replacement candidate to be named.
First, Chumlee, who’s “we?” Does that “we” include shut-ins and chronically emotionally constipated clowns like you, who learn a meaningless, irrelevant phrase like “pedophile protectors,” then use it every 5 minutes, because they’re not bright enough to know they’re just beclowning themselves?
If Trump is a Nazi then he is the first Nazi to have a Jewish daughter ( she converted to marry her Jewish husband Jared Kushner) and Jewish grandkids( they’re Jewish because she converted) . You my little antisemitic friend are a born and bred ignoramus, it’s in your genes!
I know Libs do nothing but project, but this is beyond bonkers.
Let me clear some things up for you...
The Democrats are the Nazi sympathizers, and they have been from the good old days when the NYT covered for Hitler right up to the present Platner fiasco.
Did I mention the Squad?
Now I have.
I think you are referring to the Proud Boys? Not a Nazi group in any way, shape, or form.
Dem Socialists, on the other hand?
Very Nazi.
And you seem to be very confused about pedophiles and Epstein as well.
Biden had the Epstein files but he would not release them.
Trump released them.
This is important, so I'll repeat it; pay attention: Biden hid the files, which means he protected pedophiles.
Trump released the files, exposing all the Dem/Lib pedophiles.
No. Neither side are Nazis. I've been a Republican since Nixon and strongly oppose virtually everything the Squad is for, but it minimizes what actual Nazis did to say the Squad and Democratic Socialists are Nazis. The exact same is true for those on the Left about Republicans.
Actual Nazis setup death camps. Pretty sure neither side is doing that.
If you don't realize the Dem Socialists would set up death camps on Day One you are very naive.
Look at what they tried to do to Trump - and it did not work. They have already said they will be prosecuting ICE agents, Musk, Trump...this is what they are openly saying now.
Socialists were responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths in the 20th century. Control, control, control - that's what they want, and their ideology has shown they are willing to go to extremes to get it. All they need is the power and some American voters have not learned the lessons of history, and appear ready to give it to them...
Sir, I had no idea the United States had turned into a socialist country from the 1960's on.... it is a fact that our direct military actions, support of right wing dictators that killed their own people, and economic sanctions have killed millions of people from the 60;s onward. If you want details i have the receipts. Suffice it to say that extremes in either direction are bad for humanity.
It's always Socialism for the Rich via Tax Payer Bail-Outs (see 2008 Bank & Hi Finance Bail-outs with attendant Occupy Wall Street Movement to counter....) while wailing on the Left Behind Working Class desperate for securing human necessities (Affordable Housing! Non-Stag-Nation Wages adding to Wealth Concentration of sharpie investors...), Mega Inflation of Utilities Costs etc...
"Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor" is a classical political-economic argument asserting that, in advanced capitalist societies, state policies assure that more resources flow to the rich than to the poor, for example in the form of a bailout.[1]"
"The term corporate welfare is widely used to describe the bestowal of favorable treatment to big business (particularly corporations) by the government. One of the most commonly raised forms of criticism are statements that the capitalist political economy toward large corporations allows them to benefit from government interventions ("lemon socialism").[2] The argument has been raised and cited on many occasions."
"Variations of the concept include "privatize profits and socialize risks" (or "privatize gains and socialize risks") as well as "free markets for the poor while state protection for the rich".
"History and usage"
"In his 1891 work, A Perplexed Philosopher, the economist Henry George accused the philosopher Herbert Spencer of supporting "what is essentially socialism and communism in the interest of the rich."[3] The phrase may have been popularized by Michael Harrington in his 1962 book, The Other America,[4][5] in which he cites Charles Abrams,[6] a well-known authority on housing."
"Andrew Young has been cited for calling the United States system "socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor," and Martin Luther King Jr. frequently used this wording in his speeches.[7][8] Since at least 1969, Gore Vidal widely disseminated the expression "free enterprise for the poor and socialism for the rich" to describe the U.S. economic policies,[9][10] notably using it from the 1980s in his critiques of Reaganomics.[11]"
"In winter 2006/2007, in response to criticism about oil imports from Venezuela, that country being under the leadership of Hugo Chávez, the founder and president of Boston's Citizens Energy Corporation, Joseph P. Kennedy II, countered with a critique of the U.S. system which he characterized as "a kind of socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor that leaves the most vulnerable out in the cold."[12] Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also expressed to large audiences that the United States is now a land of "socialism for the rich and brutal capitalism for the poor."[13]
"Linguist and political scientist Noam Chomsky has criticized the way in which free market principles have been applied. He has argued that the wealthy use free-market rhetoric to justify imposing greater economic risk upon the lower classes, while being insulated from the rigours of the market by the political and economic advantages that such wealth affords.[14] He remarked, "the free market is socialism for the rich—[free] markets for the poor and state protection for the rich."[15] He has stated that the rich and powerful "want to be able to run the nanny state" so that "when they are in trouble the taxpayer will bail them out," citing "too big to fail" as an example.[16]"
"Economist Ha-Joon Chang broadens the concept to encompass self-serving macroeconomic policies of the West that disadvantage the developing world, as Keynesianism for the rich and monetarism for the poor.[17]"
First off arguing that it left-wing political party is Nazi sympathizers means you don't even understand what the Nazis thought.
Nazis Hated liberals. Fucking hated them.
Trying to suggest that Democrats are Nazis means you don't know what they thought what they believed or the very specific ideas They embraced. You need to go back and read a fucking history book
"No" to what? The Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119-38) requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish all unclassified records and investigative materials in its possession regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Biden Regime leaked anything/everything they had that might damage Trump or anyone connected to him regarding anything. They leaked no Epstein/pedo stuff about Trump etc because there is nothing.
When the Epstein Files began to be released, Libs and the MSM tried to find and push things to make Trump look bad, but they were all lies. They have nothing...
No lack of documentation. Much of best Muck Raking done, unsurprisingly by the Empire City\State press that spent the most on tracking over decades. The Village Voice may have gone bust, but their Archives and sourcing hold up quite well. Also, anything Wayne Barrett published with any of the first rate publications he sold his work and document files to.
Lack of vetting and accounting follows absence of accountability in most if not all 'Oligarch Licks Plutocracy' or 'Man Bites Dog' reporting and even more fanciful story telling....Dealers' choice!
There is no dearth of first rate J-School worthy published Muck Raking and documentation with shortcuts in research like approaching some of the Muck Rakers themselves or walking into the Office Hours of any Prof worth her\his salt and expressing interest in any serious independent research project.
First off arguing that it left-wing political party is Nazi sympathizers means you don't even understand what the Nazis thought.
Nazis Hated liberals. Fucking hated them.
Trying to suggest that Democrats are Nazis means you don't know what they thought what they believed or the very specific ideas They embraced. You need to go back and read a fucking history book
No Trump was forced to release the files....be accurate here because it matters, he fought tooth and nail to avoid releasing them. While there are Democrat pedophiles mentioned in the files, there is one person that is mentioned in the files most prominently...want to take a guess who that is? So his administration has not complied with the law as written and passed...that is a fact.
Trump the GOP self-server and Platner the Maine Man Tattoo'd Huckster Working Human's Rep In Waiting are not mutually exclusive. Welcome to monochromatic complexion of our People's Politics...Chalk another up for Private Interests Trumping Our Public Interest...
Meh, Collins voted for Kavanaugh who supported torture…so she should be disqualified to be a senator and Kavanaugh should be disqualified to be a justice. But Republicans supported Bush through 2015 and Cheney through 2021.
The reality is that Trump supporters project their own TDS where they ignore ethics, integrity, morals, facts, etc. to support a man who has none of those. They ignore the lies, the grift, the corruption, the convictions , the mentions in the Epstein files. That is an extreme case of TDS and indicates an overwhelming amount of psychological dysfunction
Their Socialist. He switched from National Socialism (Nazism) to Communism, a sidestep for a woman hating POS, not a sea change in outlook. The authoritarian goals for these little leftist monsters are exactly the same as those on the socialist right. Wokism is Socialism.
True in their goals. Not to sure he hates woman as sees them as an "inferior" type of thing. Most of those type people don't "hate" woman in the sense being misogynists. See the Nazi's\Hitler's relationship with Leni Riefenstahl. There were two famous woman test pilots. One was awarded the Iron Cross But they wouldn't have been given a seat at the table so to speak. It was more of a Kinder, Küche, Kirche type thing. Very German in outlook. There weren't many if any woman test pilots for NASA but Pancho Barnes was respected by the pilots at Groom Lake. Remember also the first woman in space was put up there by Russia. But not many (any?) high level female member of the Politburo There is no socialist right. That's the illusion. The Nazi's were left not right. The Nazi's referred to themselves as National Socialists or sometimes as Revolutionary Socialists. The Communists called them selves International Socialists. Fascism is the State above all. Communism is the Party above all. Though it reality it is a form of nationalism. Russia was fine with China when it was big brother\little brother. When Mao went his own way, not so much. Russia didn't want the countries around it to be communists as much as they wanted them to be subservient to Russia. Note their relationship with Tito. If the US had turned communist but had not been subservient to Russia there would have been a war between them. There were wars between Catholic Kings and Queens as well as between various Christian monarchies. There were wars between Shia and Sunni. There were wars between Indian Tribes at the same time they were fighting the White man. So far democracies seem to have avoided most of that. Not 100% but mostly. Maybe that will end when Trump decides to bomb Canada or Greenland.
He threatened to "take Greenland the hard way" several times. You are just playing semantic games with that one.
Re Bomb Canada OTTAWA – U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra has vowed to improve anti-American sentiment he sees in Canada, no matter how many illegal tariffs, forced annexations, or literal bombs it takes to do it. The above is from a Canadian satire site. Jonah Goldberg wrote a piece in the National Review on the case for bombing Canada (November 2002) There is a book called Bomb Canada by Chantal Allan. It's also a meme (Blame Canada) via a South Park movie and several episodes. On a slightly more serious note (maybe) Canadians were discussing Canada developing its own Nukes to discourage a US invasion.
Suggestions: 1. Google Bomb Canada" Memes. 2.Try doubling down on the Red pills.
Next time I'll post smiley emoticons at the end to help you figure it out. And yes. you do have TAS
It’s telling how desperate Democrats are for candidates that they dug this guy up in the first place. It’s also telling how nakedly partisan they have become. Trump has driven them insane (which is, of course, part of his strategy). I think they’re doomed in November.
If you haven't seen the interview with the loathsome couple who dug him up and pitched him as a candidate you owe it to yourself. You can't even make up these people. https://youtu.be/adHzmDI4LXw?si=JhJRSQQ6xpWF8nvs
He comes from a long line of losers the Democrats have supported for decades: Eric Swalwell, Anthony Weiner, Bob Menendez, Ted Kennedy, et al. Ruben Gallego is about to join the list.
It seems a penchant for “ Jew hate” and the virtue signaling of “believe all women “ have created a dilemma for the democrats. But” vote blue no matter who “ will prevail as trump hate takes precedence over anything else.
"They defended him from accusations of physical abuse. They defended him from mocking veterans. They defended him blaming women for their own sexual assaults. Worst of all, they defended his Nazi tattoo." All true and all vile, but I would argue that even without all of this, he would end up losing anyway because he is a pretend-oyster farmer-mamma's boy. Maine is pretty blue but phony blue collar waterfront candidates won't garner enough votes from real waterfront workers to win. Sail away, anti-semite.
This is the party that platformed Michael Avenatti near 300 times on national cable with zero evidence because he would bash Trump. They can’t be trusted.
As a US Marine 1985-91 and then as a Soldier in the NCARNG 1991-2013 and retired from combat wounds and lingering effects as a CWO2, I'm appalled with this leftist PoS and ashamed that he's a fellow Leatherneck…
I hope all the big donors who funded his campaign think twice the next time they consider backing a Nazi sympathizer. Now he can go back to his oyster farm bankroled by his daddy.
It is just like the Swalwell episode. The Organized Crime Democrats (OCDs) must have paid her well to come forward now. But something smells about her allegation - she claims to have deleted the most direct evidence, and the very notion that a man who is "blackout drunk" is able to get it up is highly suspect. Not impossible, but suspect.
Also of note - they did not state an exact date the supposed rape occurred, but said it was "late in 2021". If it was almost, but not quite 5 years, it might still be within the Maine statute of limitations. That could be another reason this one is being brought up, since that gives Platner additional pressure to drop out. The Democrats who run Maine could charge him if he refuses to drop out (and then of course double-cross him by charging him anyway after he drops out).
Law enforcement could charge him tomorrow if they believe the young lady can produce evidence. Without evidence it is another "she said, he said" situation.
Just to be clear - the Dems aren’t turning on him because he’s a Nazi sympathizer. They’re turning on him because they think he will lose.
Exactly. If they thought he would win, they would have paid this woman to keep silent. Instead they paid her to go to Politico in time for a replacement candidate to be named.
Bingo.
He is in a Nazi sympathizer You are just stupid.
The Nazi sympathizer is the president United States who gave literal Nazi groups orders during a nationally televised debate..
We're not going to sit here and take moral character conversations or lectures from pedophile protectors
Get help, buddy. TDS can be fatal.
We can only hope!🤣
Hahahahahahahahhaha oh man, you need to get back on your meds
Did mom forget to buy the Hot Pockets again .
You stole that line! But it is a good one...
First, Chumlee, who’s “we?” Does that “we” include shut-ins and chronically emotionally constipated clowns like you, who learn a meaningless, irrelevant phrase like “pedophile protectors,” then use it every 5 minutes, because they’re not bright enough to know they’re just beclowning themselves?
Would you say the same for Bill Clinton supporters?
If Trump is a Nazi then he is the first Nazi to have a Jewish daughter ( she converted to marry her Jewish husband Jared Kushner) and Jewish grandkids( they’re Jewish because she converted) . You my little antisemitic friend are a born and bred ignoramus, it’s in your genes!
Look, Alec - you need help.
I know Libs do nothing but project, but this is beyond bonkers.
Let me clear some things up for you...
The Democrats are the Nazi sympathizers, and they have been from the good old days when the NYT covered for Hitler right up to the present Platner fiasco.
Did I mention the Squad?
Now I have.
I think you are referring to the Proud Boys? Not a Nazi group in any way, shape, or form.
Dem Socialists, on the other hand?
Very Nazi.
And you seem to be very confused about pedophiles and Epstein as well.
Biden had the Epstein files but he would not release them.
Trump released them.
This is important, so I'll repeat it; pay attention: Biden hid the files, which means he protected pedophiles.
Trump released the files, exposing all the Dem/Lib pedophiles.
No. Neither side are Nazis. I've been a Republican since Nixon and strongly oppose virtually everything the Squad is for, but it minimizes what actual Nazis did to say the Squad and Democratic Socialists are Nazis. The exact same is true for those on the Left about Republicans.
Actual Nazis setup death camps. Pretty sure neither side is doing that.
If you don't realize the Dem Socialists would set up death camps on Day One you are very naive.
Look at what they tried to do to Trump - and it did not work. They have already said they will be prosecuting ICE agents, Musk, Trump...this is what they are openly saying now.
Never, ever, vote for a Democrat...
You're an idiot
Thanks for proving my point, Captain Fascistic!
All you Dumbocrats know how to do is project, and oops!
You did it again!
Thank you for adding some much-needed ballast to all the hot air!
Tio Mitchito
TM
yet...
Socialists were responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths in the 20th century. Control, control, control - that's what they want, and their ideology has shown they are willing to go to extremes to get it. All they need is the power and some American voters have not learned the lessons of history, and appear ready to give it to them...
Sir, I had no idea the United States had turned into a socialist country from the 1960's on.... it is a fact that our direct military actions, support of right wing dictators that killed their own people, and economic sanctions have killed millions of people from the 60;s onward. If you want details i have the receipts. Suffice it to say that extremes in either direction are bad for humanity.
It's always Socialism for the Rich via Tax Payer Bail-Outs (see 2008 Bank & Hi Finance Bail-outs with attendant Occupy Wall Street Movement to counter....) while wailing on the Left Behind Working Class desperate for securing human necessities (Affordable Housing! Non-Stag-Nation Wages adding to Wealth Concentration of sharpie investors...), Mega Inflation of Utilities Costs etc...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_for_the_rich_and_capitalism_for_the_poor
"Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor" is a classical political-economic argument asserting that, in advanced capitalist societies, state policies assure that more resources flow to the rich than to the poor, for example in the form of a bailout.[1]"
"The term corporate welfare is widely used to describe the bestowal of favorable treatment to big business (particularly corporations) by the government. One of the most commonly raised forms of criticism are statements that the capitalist political economy toward large corporations allows them to benefit from government interventions ("lemon socialism").[2] The argument has been raised and cited on many occasions."
"Variations of the concept include "privatize profits and socialize risks" (or "privatize gains and socialize risks") as well as "free markets for the poor while state protection for the rich".
"History and usage"
"In his 1891 work, A Perplexed Philosopher, the economist Henry George accused the philosopher Herbert Spencer of supporting "what is essentially socialism and communism in the interest of the rich."[3] The phrase may have been popularized by Michael Harrington in his 1962 book, The Other America,[4][5] in which he cites Charles Abrams,[6] a well-known authority on housing."
"Andrew Young has been cited for calling the United States system "socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor," and Martin Luther King Jr. frequently used this wording in his speeches.[7][8] Since at least 1969, Gore Vidal widely disseminated the expression "free enterprise for the poor and socialism for the rich" to describe the U.S. economic policies,[9][10] notably using it from the 1980s in his critiques of Reaganomics.[11]"
"In winter 2006/2007, in response to criticism about oil imports from Venezuela, that country being under the leadership of Hugo Chávez, the founder and president of Boston's Citizens Energy Corporation, Joseph P. Kennedy II, countered with a critique of the U.S. system which he characterized as "a kind of socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor that leaves the most vulnerable out in the cold."[12] Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also expressed to large audiences that the United States is now a land of "socialism for the rich and brutal capitalism for the poor."[13]
"Linguist and political scientist Noam Chomsky has criticized the way in which free market principles have been applied. He has argued that the wealthy use free-market rhetoric to justify imposing greater economic risk upon the lower classes, while being insulated from the rigours of the market by the political and economic advantages that such wealth affords.[14] He remarked, "the free market is socialism for the rich—[free] markets for the poor and state protection for the rich."[15] He has stated that the rich and powerful "want to be able to run the nanny state" so that "when they are in trouble the taxpayer will bail them out," citing "too big to fail" as an example.[16]"
"Economist Ha-Joon Chang broadens the concept to encompass self-serving macroeconomic policies of the West that disadvantage the developing world, as Keynesianism for the rich and monetarism for the poor.[17]"
Via
Tio Mitchito
TM
Mitch Ritter
Paradigm Sifters, Code Shifters, PsalmSong Chasers
Lay-Low Studios, ORe-WA (Refuge of A-Tone-ment Seekers)
Media Discussion List\Looksee\Hearsay
First off arguing that it left-wing political party is Nazi sympathizers means you don't even understand what the Nazis thought.
Nazis Hated liberals. Fucking hated them.
Trying to suggest that Democrats are Nazis means you don't know what they thought what they believed or the very specific ideas They embraced. You need to go back and read a fucking history book
Nazis are socialists; it's in their fucking name! Many Dems are Socialists.
Do the fucking math, and UNDERSTAND your fucking history...
No, the Epstein case was ongoing under Biden. The Epstein files were part of Ghislain’s prosecution.
"No" to what? The Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119-38) requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish all unclassified records and investigative materials in its possession regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Biden Regime leaked anything/everything they had that might damage Trump or anyone connected to him regarding anything. They leaked no Epstein/pedo stuff about Trump etc because there is nothing.
When the Epstein Files began to be released, Libs and the MSM tried to find and push things to make Trump look bad, but they were all lies. They have nothing...
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/new-epstein-photos-trump-clinton-house-oversight-committee.html
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/cnn-exclusive-newly-discovered-photos-and-video-shed-fresh-light-on-trumps-ties-to-jeffrey-epstein/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/epstein-files-trump-who-what-b2914340.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-politics-live-trump-meets-saudis-mbs-house-poised-vote-epstein-files-2025-11-18/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/ben-black-investment-trump-epstein
https://podcasts.la.utexas.edu/american-rhapsody/podcast/episode-3-taking-trump-seriously-the-wayne-barrett-papers/
https://www.villagevoice.com/how-a-young-donald-trump-forced-his-way-from-avenue-z-to-manhattan/
No lack of documentation. Much of best Muck Raking done, unsurprisingly by the Empire City\State press that spent the most on tracking over decades. The Village Voice may have gone bust, but their Archives and sourcing hold up quite well. Also, anything Wayne Barrett published with any of the first rate publications he sold his work and document files to.
Lack of vetting and accounting follows absence of accountability in most if not all 'Oligarch Licks Plutocracy' or 'Man Bites Dog' reporting and even more fanciful story telling....Dealers' choice!
There is no dearth of first rate J-School worthy published Muck Raking and documentation with shortcuts in research like approaching some of the Muck Rakers themselves or walking into the Office Hours of any Prof worth her\his salt and expressing interest in any serious independent research project.
Maggie Haberman's Paper Trails come to mind:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-throws-absolute-fit-at-maggie-haberman-then-misspells-his-own-insults/ar-AA26MShK
https://harvardindependent.com/inside-trumps-hold-on-power-a-conversation-with-maggie-haberman/
https://www.democracynow.org/2017/1/20/legendary_muckraking_reporter_trump_biographer_wayne
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/wayne-barrett-obituary-reporter-village-voice-trump-first-214669/
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/donald-trumps-new-york
Tio Mitchito
TM
Via
Mitch Ritter
Paradigm Sifters, Code Shifters, PsalmSong Chasers
Lay-Low Studios, Ore-Wa (Refuge of A-Tone-ment Seekers)
Media Discussion List\Looksee\Hearsay
First off arguing that it left-wing political party is Nazi sympathizers means you don't even understand what the Nazis thought.
Nazis Hated liberals. Fucking hated them.
Trying to suggest that Democrats are Nazis means you don't know what they thought what they believed or the very specific ideas They embraced. You need to go back and read a fucking history book
No Trump was forced to release the files....be accurate here because it matters, he fought tooth and nail to avoid releasing them. While there are Democrat pedophiles mentioned in the files, there is one person that is mentioned in the files most prominently...want to take a guess who that is? So his administration has not complied with the law as written and passed...that is a fact.
Trump the GOP self-server and Platner the Maine Man Tattoo'd Huckster Working Human's Rep In Waiting are not mutually exclusive. Welcome to monochromatic complexion of our People's Politics...Chalk another up for Private Interests Trumping Our Public Interest...
Tio Mitchito
TM
And by that comment we are all aware that you don't study history.
You are devoid of facts.
Oh, good grief. You're just being silly - you look ridiculous!
Great point
Meh, Collins voted for Kavanaugh who supported torture…so she should be disqualified to be a senator and Kavanaugh should be disqualified to be a justice. But Republicans supported Bush through 2015 and Cheney through 2021.
Yeah!
So vote for the Nazi!
Idiot...
😂😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡
But he was their Nazi. And that makes all the difference.
BINGO
https://substack.com/@thinktorah/note/c-275207903
Just like Trump is yours, LOL.
“Grab ‘em by the pussy” should have been enough a decade ago. And the guy’s only gotten worse since then.
The reality is that Trump supporters project their own TDS where they ignore ethics, integrity, morals, facts, etc. to support a man who has none of those. They ignore the lies, the grift, the corruption, the convictions , the mentions in the Epstein files. That is an extreme case of TDS and indicates an overwhelming amount of psychological dysfunction
hardly the same - and Jean Carrol's accusations were a joke...
Their Socialist. He switched from National Socialism (Nazism) to Communism, a sidestep for a woman hating POS, not a sea change in outlook. The authoritarian goals for these little leftist monsters are exactly the same as those on the socialist right. Wokism is Socialism.
True in their goals. Not to sure he hates woman as sees them as an "inferior" type of thing. Most of those type people don't "hate" woman in the sense being misogynists. See the Nazi's\Hitler's relationship with Leni Riefenstahl. There were two famous woman test pilots. One was awarded the Iron Cross But they wouldn't have been given a seat at the table so to speak. It was more of a Kinder, Küche, Kirche type thing. Very German in outlook. There weren't many if any woman test pilots for NASA but Pancho Barnes was respected by the pilots at Groom Lake. Remember also the first woman in space was put up there by Russia. But not many (any?) high level female member of the Politburo There is no socialist right. That's the illusion. The Nazi's were left not right. The Nazi's referred to themselves as National Socialists or sometimes as Revolutionary Socialists. The Communists called them selves International Socialists. Fascism is the State above all. Communism is the Party above all. Though it reality it is a form of nationalism. Russia was fine with China when it was big brother\little brother. When Mao went his own way, not so much. Russia didn't want the countries around it to be communists as much as they wanted them to be subservient to Russia. Note their relationship with Tito. If the US had turned communist but had not been subservient to Russia there would have been a war between them. There were wars between Catholic Kings and Queens as well as between various Christian monarchies. There were wars between Shia and Sunni. There were wars between Indian Tribes at the same time they were fighting the White man. So far democracies seem to have avoided most of that. Not 100% but mostly. Maybe that will end when Trump decides to bomb Canada or Greenland.
A nice post tainted at the end by TDS...
Well he did threaten to bomb Greenland. And South Park made the case for blaming Canada. Also see below.
https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/09/us-ambassador-threatens-to-tariff-annex-and-bomb-canada-if-anti-american-sentiment-doesnt-improve/
The opposite of TDS is TAS. Trump Adoration Syndrome.
No TAS here and no he never threatened to bomb Canada or Greenland.
He threatened to "take Greenland the hard way" several times. You are just playing semantic games with that one.
Re Bomb Canada OTTAWA – U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra has vowed to improve anti-American sentiment he sees in Canada, no matter how many illegal tariffs, forced annexations, or literal bombs it takes to do it. The above is from a Canadian satire site. Jonah Goldberg wrote a piece in the National Review on the case for bombing Canada (November 2002) There is a book called Bomb Canada by Chantal Allan. It's also a meme (Blame Canada) via a South Park movie and several episodes. On a slightly more serious note (maybe) Canadians were discussing Canada developing its own Nukes to discourage a US invasion.
Suggestions: 1. Google Bomb Canada" Memes. 2.Try doubling down on the Red pills.
Next time I'll post smiley emoticons at the end to help you figure it out. And yes. you do have TAS
It’s telling how desperate Democrats are for candidates that they dug this guy up in the first place. It’s also telling how nakedly partisan they have become. Trump has driven them insane (which is, of course, part of his strategy). I think they’re doomed in November.
If you haven't seen the interview with the loathsome couple who dug him up and pitched him as a candidate you owe it to yourself. You can't even make up these people. https://youtu.be/adHzmDI4LXw?si=JhJRSQQ6xpWF8nvs
He comes from a long line of losers the Democrats have supported for decades: Eric Swalwell, Anthony Weiner, Bob Menendez, Ted Kennedy, et al. Ruben Gallego is about to join the list.
Headline says it all.
Over on X Cenk Ugyur is blaming AIPAC and doesn’t believe the allegations. I guess
1. “Believe all women” no longer applies and
2. AIPAC broke into this poor woman’s home and raped her.
Of course, my dog could have written that for Cenk.
I just walked my dog and he dropped a large Cenk on the lawn 🤣
My dog’s Cenk is bigger than your dog’s Cenk 🤣🤣😎
I’m laughing so hard.
HA! lol
Especially if they are Republicans or conservative - then they don’t count I guess
I don't believe it either because I doubt a man who is "blackout drunk" could get it up.
He may have washed down a couple of viagra with his booze.
I don't think even a few Viagra or Cialis could do that.
I’ll take your word for it.
"That ex-girlfriend was dismissed because she’s a Republican."
Whatever happened to "believe all women"?
The same thing that happened to “Sex with a subordinate is per se sexual abuse” when Bill Clinton got caught doing it.
Thank you Batya. Sometimes I feel that we are treated as idiots.
It seems a penchant for “ Jew hate” and the virtue signaling of “believe all women “ have created a dilemma for the democrats. But” vote blue no matter who “ will prevail as trump hate takes precedence over anything else.
The results of the ny primaries bear that out.
"They defended him from accusations of physical abuse. They defended him from mocking veterans. They defended him blaming women for their own sexual assaults. Worst of all, they defended his Nazi tattoo." All true and all vile, but I would argue that even without all of this, he would end up losing anyway because he is a pretend-oyster farmer-mamma's boy. Maine is pretty blue but phony blue collar waterfront candidates won't garner enough votes from real waterfront workers to win. Sail away, anti-semite.
This is the party that platformed Michael Avenatti near 300 times on national cable with zero evidence because he would bash Trump. They can’t be trusted.
Should NEVER have been a candidate. Shame on all the enablers
https://substack.com/@thinktorah/note/c-275207903
He won with 3/4 of the vote in the Primary. Let that sink in.
No one else was running at that point.
As a US Marine 1985-91 and then as a Soldier in the NCARNG 1991-2013 and retired from combat wounds and lingering effects as a CWO2, I'm appalled with this leftist PoS and ashamed that he's a fellow Leatherneck…
He now will drop out and the Dims will simply appoint someone to run in his place, just like they did with Joe Biden
And that someone will lose. Self inflicted, again.
Should have been but the Democrats love antisemitism up to and including Nazis
I hope all the big donors who funded his campaign think twice the next time they consider backing a Nazi sympathizer. Now he can go back to his oyster farm bankroled by his daddy.
It is just like the Swalwell episode. The Organized Crime Democrats (OCDs) must have paid her well to come forward now. But something smells about her allegation - she claims to have deleted the most direct evidence, and the very notion that a man who is "blackout drunk" is able to get it up is highly suspect. Not impossible, but suspect.
Also of note - they did not state an exact date the supposed rape occurred, but said it was "late in 2021". If it was almost, but not quite 5 years, it might still be within the Maine statute of limitations. That could be another reason this one is being brought up, since that gives Platner additional pressure to drop out. The Democrats who run Maine could charge him if he refuses to drop out (and then of course double-cross him by charging him anyway after he drops out).
Law enforcement could charge him tomorrow if they believe the young lady can produce evidence. Without evidence it is another "she said, he said" situation.
Excellent Batya! Thanks for pushing this news out so FAST! Let's see if the legacy media leads with the story. Ha ha.